Michigan Association of CPAsBusiness EdgeProblem Solving
HOME E-NEWS LEADERS' EDGE SEMINARS & CONFERENCES CLASSIFIEDS
Nov. 10, 2004
Volume 1, No. 1
 
In this issue...
 -  Guess What? There Are No Silver Bullets
 -  About Brainstorming
 -  Coaching: A Shift from the Locker Room to the Boardroom
 -  The More Things Change…
 -  Business Interruption Presents Challenges for CFOs
 -  Get the Global Edge

About Brainstorming

By Herbert “Hal” Rosenthal, CPA, CFE, CVA

“If you don’t know where you are going, any road will take you there.”

Lewis Carroll, “Alice in Wonderland”

Introduction
When engaged in the attempt to develop and achieve goals, organizations are automatically involved in the process of group-form decision making and problem solving. The skill with which that process is carried out and, indeed, the degree to which it is understood, has a significant bearing on a company’s ability to achieve its goals.
Brainstorming is one of the procedures used in the group-form problem solving process, and for a very specific purpose. It helps to elicit opportunities and threats that may otherwise have gone unnoticed until too late. Therefore, it is in the interest of forward-thinking companies to gain a better understanding of brainstorming and of the problem-solving process of which it is a part.

Problem Solving
It is best that one understands the nature of a problem in order to solve it – with or without the use of brainstorming. A problem is a state of disorder. More specifically, it is the lack of a desired or conceived order as compared to the natural or currently existing order.

To illustrate this through an example, let's move out of the boardroom and into the field, so to speak. It is part of the natural order for corn to grow. However, it is not part of the natural order for corn to grow in tidy rows; heavily concentrated in a specific field or fields; distinguished by who owns or rents those fields; and in fields in which there exists sufficient nutrients, adequate sunlight and the absence of extreme temperature or rain, to better assure a successful harvest. The prior sentence represents the desired or conceived order of a farmer. The farmer’s “problem” — or state of disorder — is how to convert the natural order (or currently existing order) of corn into his desired or conceived order.

The quality of a problem’s solution is limited by the quality of its definition!
Think of the catastrophic results that might occur if the farmer implemented solutions to the above-defined problem, but the definition of the problem, and the resultant solution, failed to include provisions for adequate drainage or animal and insect control.

The first value of brainstorming is to come up with an expanded list of items or ideas that are to be considered during the problem-definition process.

Three separate steps are needed to achieve an acceptable level of problem definition.
The first step should be to accurately state the problem, preferably in the form of a question. An example of this might be: “How can we have corn come to grow in rows, and heavily concentrated in a specific field or fields in which there exists sufficient nutrients, adequate sunlight and the absence of extreme temperature or rain to better assure a successful harvest?”

The second step is to expand the individual elements of the first level. This is where the additional items of adequate drainage, plus animal and insect control, would likely evolve.

The third level is to separately address and expand upon each of the items identified in levels one and two for purposes of analysis and definition. It cannot and should not be assumed that any of the individual items included thus far in the process of defining the problem are complete, accurate or equally understood by all members of the group.

For example, take the single word “rows” used above. The following might be applicable:

  1. What are the intended purposes of the rows?
  2. How many rows shall there be?
  3. In what direction shall the rows be and why?
  4. How far apart should the rows be and why?
  5. How close to the end of the field shall the rows extend?

Typical results of a proper problem definition:
Two immediate observations arise when the problem is correctly defined. First, upon proper analysis in the definition stage, it is frequently found that a problem is actually a conglomerate of separate problems, each of which requires adequate independent attention. Second, solutions to problems are often self-apparent as an outgrowth of a properly conducted problem-definition function.

The Order of Activity©
Attention to the proper sequence is vital in solving problems. After all, if in certain other aspects of our lives we go out of order, there could be serious consequences.

To drive an automobile one must open the door, get in, turn on the ignition, put it in gear and press on the accelerator – in that exact order. Pressing on the accelerator before turning on the ignition, I don’t have to tell you, is not a recommended way to drive a car.

Similarly, there is an order of activity that should be recognized in connection with solving a problem and with the use of brainstorming in connection with that activity. The order involves:

  1. Trying to define or uncover a problem;
  2. Collecting information relevant to a problem;
  3. Gathering ideas that may offer possible solutions;
  4. Evaluating ideas or alternate courses of action so as to select a possible solution to try.

If the brainstorming activity were not monitored in recognition of that order, it may lead to key elements being excluded from consideration, thereby leading to potentially disastrous results. In that regard, and contrary to popular belief, brainstorming should not be assumed to be a random and uncontrolled endeavor in the aggregate.

The Order of Questioning©
The asking of questions should conform to the Order of Activity©. If a participant is allowed to ask a question that is not recognized as being at level 3 of the order, the group as a whole will have been diverted from addressing levels 1 and 2, leading to potentially disastrous results.

Conclusion
Brainstorming serves as a procedure to better enhance the benefits to be derived when accessing group brainpower. More profound benefits can be achieved when brainstorming is conducted in recognition of, and in conformity with, the function of which it is naturally a part. In actuality, brainstorming in its best form involves what may be simply expressed as a controlled lack of control.

About the Author
Hal Rosenthal, CPA, CFE, CVA, who is based in Boca Raton, Fla., has for many years been involved in extensive study of problem-solving and group dynamics. He has provided training nationally to organizations in which maximizing the value of management’s brainpower is considered a priority. Hal can be reached at hr@askhal.com.

Printer Friendly
5480 Corporate Drive, Suite 200, Troy, MI 48098 Phone: 248.267.3700 Fax: 248.267.3737 E-mail: businessedge@michcpa.org